Comparing the AIDS epidemic to the Current Health Crisis

During the 1980s the entire public, including elementary school children, was swept up into a propaganda program to scare everyone into thinking all people were equally at risk to get the horrible deadly disease called GRID (Gay-Related Immune Deficiency) which was quickly changed to AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome).

Now, despite persistent propaganda, even some gays admit AIDS is a gay disease, which by the way, is still a huge problem among the irresponsible, hedonistic gay population which spreads it through promiscuous sodomy and tainted drug needles, fully encouraged and celebrated by the powers that be in society and government. But back then it wasn't portrayed as a sexually transmitted disease. Oh no, it was something even school children could easily contract. By sitting on toilet seats. Not.

At the time we were personally astonished and annoyed at the distorted reporting, fear-mongering, and encroachment of false information about this STD into our young children's minds in school. It was completely out of place and outrageous. We opted our kids out of surveys and assemblies and such, which made them embarrassed, the opting out which is now something that is no longer allowed when it comes to homosexualist propaganda being taught at schools. Everyone knows, or should know, that homosexualism is being proudly promoted in schools and libraries and churches and every other societal entity today.

Please note it was public health experts that made or let that happen and continue to let it happen, even with health risks for this behavior worsening all the time. For example, drug use (which makes users forget to take meds), the ease of finding instant, one-time partners on the internet, unprotected group sex, and people who have HIV-AIDS mixing freely with the public---all of the above in some combination are common. In addition, younger and younger people are getting involved in homosex, most likely because of huge societal acceptance, internet porn, encouragement from the gay community, sexual abuse/initiation by sex predators, and the promotion of secularism. The CDC reported in 2017 that the age for the contraction of AIDS has greatly lowered, with a dramatic increase at age 15. Fifteen to 24-year-olds account for half of all new STD infections, including AIDS. Should we fully trust public health experts? Ever?

There are some similarities happening now to how the AIDS epidemic, which also disrupted the nation in some significant ways such as public campaigns everywhere and blood donations becoming tainted, was handled. While the current virus is overwhelmingly dangerous to older people with serious health problems, obese people, and otherwise very sick people, it is increasingly being touted as dangerous to everyone and proclaimed that all people are extremely dangerous to each other in casual ways, just as was touted during the AIDS epidemic. This is happening even though it is known that it is overwhelmingly older/sick people who are most at risk of fatality, who could easily be isolated, watched, and cared for, while the rest of the population, some are saying 98 %, is affected not at all, mildly, or experiences a very bad flu that is completely recovered from without hospitalization. And yet people in all categories are being increasingly ordered to shut themselves in their houses indefinitely. Is propaganda spreading faster than the virus?

Another question: Why weren't/aren't gays sequestered away from each other in the face of the terrible disease they pass around through discretionary sexual pleasures? No one ever told gays to change their sexual behavior to "slow the spread" or "flatten the curve" while we, who are doing all we can not to spread the current virus, are urged or ordered to avoid mere social visits. Meaning nonsexual. The closest they got to suggesting any precaution for spreading AIDS through promiscuous gay sex was the condom campaign, which was decided to be ineffective/undesirable for this type of sex. And they continue to insist that it is the government's job to find a cure for a disease they bring upon themselves.

Gay sexual behaviors, although not as immediately deadly as they used to be because of new drug cocktails at great cost to the public, still cause chronic health problems and shorten lives at great cost to the public. Obviously, gays weren't quarantined because the "right" to have unlimited sex was deemed without question more important than public health protocol and all sorts of costs to the not-at-any-risk vast majority of the population. And yet today, the actual right to pursue happiness, that is, work, associate, assemble, travel, speak freely, worship is obviously not more important than the public health and all sorts of costs during the current crisis. Can you wrap your mind around that? Isn't this a huge double standard?

Should gays be responsible to prevent spreading their horrible disease that causes so much trouble and suffering and expense and early death? Yes. But that is not even a topic of science or even conversation.

Not to actually compare this horrific gay disease that is completely preventable with the current serious virus which people contract through no deliberate act of their own, but there is a similar prevention methodology that should be instigated. It refers to Occam's Razor, meaning that the simplest, most logical, most obvious answer is the right one. But that is the kind of answer people these days refuse to acknowledge or even consider because of political correctness and other nonsense. That obvious answer is for at-risk people to self-isolate like they do whenever there is a bad flu, while the rest of the world carries on in order for the robust economy to most readily deal with any crisis, treat the sufferers, and save lives, and so there's a vibrant world left for everybody.

The same public health experts who officiated in the AIDS epidemic are largely in charge of us today. Is that a problem? Yes.